Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-mboned-ieee802-mcast-problems-05.txt
"Jeffrey \(Zhaohui\) Zhang" <[email protected]> Mon, 29 Apr 2019 20:22:26 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.mboned |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CO2PR05MB2455281E7BAEE0F6063663C1D4390@CO2PR05MB2455.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> |
I was hoping to hear that, even w/o the unicast conversion, since the router does not have to use a low speed to reach many receivers (of different signaling levels), it would not be problem. Guess I was too naïve 😊 Thanks. Jeffrey Juniper Internal > -----Original Message----- > From: Mikael Abrahamsson <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 4:17 PM > To: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [MBONED] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mboned-ieee802-mcast- > problems-05.txt > > On Mon, 29 Apr 2019, Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang wrote: > > > I am also curious, in a home environment, if only one receiver joins a > > particular multicast flow (e.g. one viewer for a multicast TV channel), > > how much trouble would a typical consumer router run into if we turn on > > multicast? > > >From my understanding most customer routers do not have the > multicast->wifi-unicast conversion mechanism, so it'd start to transmit > the multicast stream at low speeds without any retransmit mechanism, > giving that receiver lots of packet loss for this multicast plus chewing > up most of the airtime. > > So that's a bad idea... > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected] _______________________________________________ MBONED mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned