Re: WGLCs for draft-ietf-mboned-ieee802-mcast-problems and draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery

I support advancing ieee802-mcast-problems, in case I haven't
expressed that (I can't find it in my sent emails, so I'm embarrassed
to notice that maybe I didn't, after the last round incorporating my
review comments.)

I've volunteered as shepherd for this doc, and now that I've skimmed
through some of the resources[1-3] about that, it seems I should be
doing the write-up now.

Cheers,
Jake

[1] file:///Users/jholland/Downloads/rtgwg_train_8.pdf
[2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4858
[3] https://www6.ietf.org/iesg/statement/document-shepherds.html

On 2019-06-04, 13:45, "Warren Kumari" <[email protected]> wrote:

    As an author on one of these documents:
    
    Dear WG,
    
    You expressed interest in these documents, and we've had (IMO) some
    good discussions on them at meetings
    (draft-perkins-intarea-multicast-ieee802 merged into
    draft-ietf-mboned-ieee802-mcast-problem) -- I think that the document
    are an easy read, and serve a useful purpose.
    
    Please take some time to read, and post comments to the list -- as
    someone who often has to deal with WiFi issues caused from excessive
    broadcast / multicast, I'd really appreciate this topic getting more
    review and wider attention.
    
    W
    
    
    
    
    On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 10:43 AM Leonard Giuliano
    <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >
    > WGLCs have completed for both draft-ietf-mboned-ieee802-mcast-problems and
    > draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery, and to date, we've only received
    > support on the list for advancing these docs from two and five
    > non-authors, respectively.  This is not enough to determine consensus for
    > advancing either doc.
    >
    > That said, both docs have enjoyed tremendous support from folks in the
    > meetings/list in the past and there has been no particularly controversies
    > noted in either doc.  As such, we've decided to extend the WGLC for the
    > next 10 days give a little extra time to hear from folks.
    >
    > Please reply to this if you do/do not support advancing
    > either/both/neither doc by Jun 13.  And further comments on either doc
    > would be welcome.
    >
    >
    > -Chairs
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > MBONED mailing list
    > [email protected]
    > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
    
    
    
    -- 
    I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
    idea in the first place.
    This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
    regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
    of pants.
       ---maf
    
    _______________________________________________
    MBONED mailing list
    [email protected]
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
    

_______________________________________________
MBONED mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned