Re: Questions re: draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery

On 2019-10-27, 14:49, "Warren Kumari" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I believe that this addresses my concern - another WGLC seems like a
> good idea, but I think you could also do a compress, 1 week call only
> on the changed text; seeing as this would likely push right into the
> draft cutoff, I suspect a regualr WGLC makes more sense.

Thanks Warren.

I went ahead and posted it:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery-09
https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery-09.txt

I'm good with whatever the chairs think is best to give people a chance
to look it over.

Best regards,
Jake


_______________________________________________
MBONED mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned