Re: "Constant feature sets"
Graham Klyne <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.medfree |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 10:54 19/01/99 -0800, Ted Hardie wrote: [...] >Having named it hard, I would like to take a crack at defining the >problem and discussing what methods there are for solving it. Ted, >From where I stand, you have not so much described "the problem", but another scenario for the application of "constant feature sets". I think we need to distil these scenarios into some kind of clear, application-independent statement of the goals of a "constant feature set" proposal. Comments? #g