Re: associating constant feature sets wi

At 10:14 20/01/99 -0500, Reynolds Franklin NRC/Boston wrote:
[...]
>I agree with Graham that we can separate most of the issues of naming
>and representation of feature sets from "transfer". I am very interested
>in an HTTP specific version of the negotiation protocol but I don't have
>a strong preference about where the work takes place.

Nor I...  I'm just keen to maintain the separation.

The little precedent that we have (i.e. fax) suggests that the transfer
elements for HTTP would be dealt with by an HTTP-oriented group.

#g

------------
Graham Klyne
([email protected])