RE: Common feature sets: scenarios, term

At 11:08 21/01/99 -0500, Reynolds Franklin NRC/Boston wrote:
[...]
>>(R2) Extension of capability expressions to allow "delegation" between
>>expressions.

[...]
>I don't think I understand (R2).
>
>I think someway to override a feature assertion within a common feature
>set (override a default) is valuable.
>
>I also think it is valuable to be able to dynamically change a single
>feature assertion without retransmitting the entire feature set.

I meant both of these things!  Maybe this is my peculiar view, but I see
these as being different applications of the same requirement, and was
trying to capture the requirement.  I'll clarify my notes.

Thanks.

#g

------------
Graham Klyne
([email protected])