RE: Common feature sets: scenarios, term

[email protected] (Reynolds Franklin NRC/Boston)
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.medfree
Organization Nokia Telecommunications
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I am still a little fuzzy on how this might work. I would hope that things like
printers and faxes will eventually be registered in some sort of directory
(perhaps LDAP or SLP) which supports attribute based queries. If true,
would this suggest that we consider mapping the algebra to a LDAP
query?

Franklin Reynolds
Nokia Research Center

 ----------
From: Graham Klyne
To: Reynolds Franklin (NRC/Boston)
Cc: conneg WG
Subject: RE: Common feature sets: scenarios, term
Date: Friday, January 22, 1999 12:20PM

At 10:57 21/01/99 -0500, Reynolds Franklin NRC/Boston wrote:
[...]
>>(S3) Providing an expression of corporate policy with respect to
>>media capabilities.
[...]
>Practically speaking, I don't think I understand (S3). Why would anyone
>want to provide a corporate policy with respect to media capabilities?
>What would be a reasonable example of such a policy?

OK, this needs clarifying:  I'll add something to my notes.

I am thinking of something like an Internet fax scenario, where an
organization may have a variety of internal Ifax receivers, and may wish to
publish some common level of capability that will be accepted (e.g. black
and white, grey scale but no colour; resolutions up to 200dpi). This might
be a way for dealing with "hunt group" problems within an organization.

I note that this is a scenario that is probably not relevant to HTTP-style
transfers.

#g

 ------------
Graham Klyne
([email protected])
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.