RE: Common feature sets: scenarios, term
[email protected] (Reynolds Franklin NRC/Boston)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.medfree |
|---|---|
| Organization | Nokia Telecommunications |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I am still a little fuzzy on how this might work. I would hope that things like printers and faxes will eventually be registered in some sort of directory (perhaps LDAP or SLP) which supports attribute based queries. If true, would this suggest that we consider mapping the algebra to a LDAP query? Franklin Reynolds Nokia Research Center ---------- From: Graham Klyne To: Reynolds Franklin (NRC/Boston) Cc: conneg WG Subject: RE: Common feature sets: scenarios, term Date: Friday, January 22, 1999 12:20PM At 10:57 21/01/99 -0500, Reynolds Franklin NRC/Boston wrote: [...] >>(S3) Providing an expression of corporate policy with respect to >>media capabilities. [...] >Practically speaking, I don't think I understand (S3). Why would anyone >want to provide a corporate policy with respect to media capabilities? >What would be a reasonable example of such a policy? OK, this needs clarifying: I'll add something to my notes. I am thinking of something like an Internet fax scenario, where an organization may have a variety of internal Ifax receivers, and may wish to publish some common level of capability that will be accepted (e.g. black and white, grey scale but no colour; resolutions up to 200dpi). This might be a way for dealing with "hunt group" problems within an organization. I note that this is a scenario that is probably not relevant to HTTP-style transfers. #g ------------ Graham Klyne ([email protected])