Re: associating constant feature sets with URLs
Graham Klyne <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.medfree |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 19:37 22/01/99 +0100, Koen Holtman wrote: >[....] >>To stand back from these terms, I think this group should focus on >>*representation*, not *transfer*, of capability information. > >I would agree with this. It is OK with me if we talk about the >semantics of how a represention of a (partial) feature set can be >merged into another feature set, once it has been transported. Yes, exactly! (IMO) #g ------------ Graham Klyne ([email protected])