re: RDF in the ccpp.txt draft

At 14:05 27/01/99 -0500, Reynolds Franklin NRC/Boston wrote:
>
>This note is intended to summarize a discussion Graham and I have had
>about the ccpp.txt draft.

I think that was a fair summary of our discussion, but a nit...

The 'conneg' example you gave:

>     (&  (pix-x=640)
>         (pix-y=280)
>         (color=256))

Doesn't quite match the XML/RDF you gave (see below).  I think you meant:

#     (&  (pix-x<=640)
#         (pix-y<=280)
#         (color<=256))

The XML/RDF you give was:

><?xml version="1.0"?>
>
><RDF xmlns="http://w3.org/TR/1999/PR-rdf-syntax-19990105#"
>  xmlns:rdf="http://w3.org/TR/1999/PR-rdf-syntax-19990105#"
>  xmlns:PRF="http://www.w3C.org/TR/WD-profile-vocabulary#"
>  xmlns:conneg="http://www.ietf.org/mumble/">
>
><Description ID="VGA display">
>
>     <conneg:feature-description rdf:parseType="Resource">
>                 <conneg:conjunction>AND</conneg:conjunction>
>                 <conneg:feature rdf:parseType="Resource">
>                         <PRF:pix-x>640</PRF:pix-x>
>                         <conneg:relation>LE</conneg:relation>
>                 </conneg:feature>
>                 <conneg:feature rdf:parseType="Resource">
>                         <PRF:pix-y>280</PRF:pix-y>
>                         <conneg:relation>LE</conneg:relation>
>                 </conneg:feature>
>                 <conneg:feature rdf:parseType="Resource">
>                         <PRF:color>256</PRF:color>
>                         <conneg:relation>LE</conneg:relation>
>                 </conneg:feature>
>     </conneg:feature-description>
>
></Description>
></RDF>

#g

------------
Graham Klyne
([email protected])