RE: Ted's concerns about wastefulness (Accept-* problem)
"Martin J. Duerst" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.medfree |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 22:52 99/01/29 PST, Larry Masinter wrote:
> > The lookup problem bothers me, because I believe there will be
> > relatively few cases where the hash as given would be instantly
> > recognizable (since it includes both features and feature values).
>
> (SONY_VGA_MODELXXX) :-
> (| (& (pix-x=640)
> (pix-y=280)
> (color=256))
> (& (pix-x=1028)
> (pix-y=1028)
> (color=256)))
> is equivalent in this regard to
> (fh=1aXb124AsDfg) :-
> (| (& (pix-x=640) ...)
(SONY_VGA_MODELXXX) :-
(| (& (pix-x=640)
(pix-y=280)
(color=256))
(& (pix-x=1028)
(pix-y=1028)
(color=256)))
is obviously equivalent to:
(SONY_VGA_MODELXXX) :-
(| (& (pix-x=640)
(color=256)
(pix-y=280))
(& (pix-y=1028)
(pix-x=1028)
(color=256)))
or
(SONY_VGA_MODELXXX) :- (| (& (pix-x=640) (color=256) (pix-y=280))
(& (pix-y=1028) (pix-x=1028) (color=256)))
or a lot of other combinations. Can you make sure that all these
things hash the same?
Regards, Martin.
#-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, World Wide Web Consortium
#-#-# mailto:[email protected] http://www.w3.org