Re: ISSUE: URI form for hash draft
Graham Klyne <[email protected]> Tue, 08 Jun 1999 13:25:04 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.medfree |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 12:12 07/06/99 -0700, [email protected] wrote: >The current hash draft allows a URI to be on either the left hand side >or the right hand side of feature declaration. Ted, Without attempting to debate the merits of the issue at hand in this message, I think the statement above is confusing. As the draft is currently written, the <URI> form may appear anywhere within a feature expression (which of itself does not have an LHS and RHS). E.g. (& (dpi<=200) <http://www.acme.com/widget/features.html> ) The proposal that I thought you were making was to restrict the <URI> form to the RHS of an auxiliary predicate definition, so the above expression would be written as something like: (& (dpi<=200) (h.1234567890abcdef1234567890abcdef) ) where (h.1234567890abcdef1234567890abcdef) :- <http://www.acme.com/widget/features.html> [Note that this form of '<URI>' to represent a feature expression is quite distinct from a feature tag with a 'u.' leading facet.] #g ------------ Graham Klyne ([email protected])