RE: RFC 2534 list of ua-media and paper-size values
Al Gilman <[email protected]> Fri, 15 Oct 1999 23:33:53 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.medfree |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 02:28 PM 10/15/99 -0700, Larry Masinter wrote: >Here's a cut at vocabulary alignment between HTML and RFC 2534. > >HTML screen: arguably the same as RFC2534 screen >HTML tty: no analog; add this to RFC 2534 >HTML tv: combines several media features. I suggest changing RFC 2534 > 'screen-paged' to add "or which has limited scrolling capabilities" > to "which cannot scroll", and then defining HTML tv as > 'screen-paged', color=full and some description of > pix-x & pix-y >HTML projection: is this a kind of 'screen'? Or we should register it? Close match to screen-paged. But note that for projection one uses larger fonts, so projection is an issue in itself. See also <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/media.html#media-types>. >HTML handheld: No media feature for "limited bandwidth"; maybe we need > some feature to describe size in bytes, e.g., 'docsize<2000' ? > otherwise (small screen, monochrome, bitmapped graphics) > corresponds to ua-media=screen,pix-x<200,pix-y<200,color=binary >HTML print: sort of like 2534 stationery. In retrospect, I wonder about the > RFC 2534 distinction with 'transparency', 'envelope', > 'envelope-plain' is useful. I was trying to be compatible > with the printer mib, but it's not really "ua-media". > 'continuous' might have been useful for fax if it really > denoted 'roll paper', but the definition there says > 'continuously connected sheets of opaque material' which > makes it sound like it's paged. > >HTML braille, aural: these aren't in RFC 2534, and probably should > be. > >If we add 'print', we could eliminate or deprecate 'stationery', >'envelope', 'envelope-plain', 'transparency' and 'continuous' in >favor of recognizing 'print', then the relationship with IPP is >clearer, since most of the IPP media types are a kind of 'print'. > >Summary of changes to RFC 2534 UA-Media > add 'tty' > modify 'screen-paged' to note "or limited scroll capabilities" > add 'projection' > add 'print' as "any kind of printed material". > deprecate 'continous', 'transparency', 'envelope', and 'envelope-plain'; > note that these are kinds of 'print'. Note that > continuous rolls might be noted as 'print' with no pix-y limit. > add 'braille' and 'aural' with the same definitions as in HTML 4.0. > >For alignment with IPP, we'll need to update RFC 2534 paper sizes >(mainly adding values), add feature(s) for paper color(ed), and then >describe IPP media primarily as "print". Maybe 'continuous', >'transparency', 'envelope' and 'envelope-plain' are all parts >of some (new) paper-type feature. >