RE: [VPIM] Analogy to Content-Duration for Faxes

Graham Klyne <[email protected]> Wed, 08 Mar 2000 10:44:36 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.medfree
Message-ID <[email protected]>
John,

I think there's nothing wrong with a small RFC :-)

<draft-ietf-conneg-content-features-02.txt> has already gone forward for 
last call, and the IESG review is (at least) partially done.  Also, there's 
not an obvious linkage between registration of "pages" and the 
"content-features:" header proposal, so I think they are better kept separate.

BTW, I think Larry's proposal was always to register "pages", as you 
suggest, and that the reference to "UA-media" was simply a (subsidiary) 
possibility to qualify the kind of "page" being indicated.

Regards,

#g
--


At 11:38 PM 3/7/00 +0200, Neystadt, John wrote:
>ua-media doesn't fits well, we are not talking about user agents here.
>
>I think registering media feaure "pages" is a better one.
>
>What should be done to go forward with this. It seems to small item for an
>RFC, can't we take tremp and add it into
>draft-ietf-conneg-content-features.txt?
>
>John Neystadt
>[email protected]
>http://www.neystadt.org/john/
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Larry Masinter [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Thu, February 10, 2000 4:35 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Cc: Neystadt, John; IETF VPIM List; [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: [VPIM] Analogy to Content-Duration for Faxes
> >
> >
> >
> > # > Content-Features: pages=10
> >
> > # > to note a 10-page document.
> >
> > # Might even want to have an additional attribute to say what
> > sort of "page"
> > # you're talking about.
> >
> > RFC 2534 already registers 'ua-media' tag with values such as
> > 'screen-paged'
> > and 'stationery' (most likely the kind of pages you'd want
> > with faxes), and
> > a 'paper-size' tag with additional token values. At the time
> > RFC 2534 was
> > written, we were focusing mainly on media features for
> > recipients rather
> > than
> > for content; you might still want to characterize a fax
> > recipient as having
> > a maximum number of pages its willing to receive, though.
> >
> >
> >
> >

------------
Graham Klyne
([email protected])