Re: comments on draft-hoffman-char-lang-media
[email protected] Wed, 26 Apr 2000 09:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.medfree |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I agree with Graham here. I believe it would be valuable to be able to indicate whether a feature is a preference, capability, characteristic, or lable, but I do not believe that could be done at the time of registration. In a bilateral exchange, it will commonly be both a capability and a characteristic. regards, Ted Hardie > > At 02:49 PM 4/25/00 -0700, Larry Masinter wrote: > >I think that we might want to consider revising the feature registration > >BCP to encourage registrations to be clearer about whether a feature > >represents a preference, capability, characteristic, and whether the > >feature requires explicit labelling as such. > > Does this not presume that the distinction is wholely implied by the > feature tag? > > Use of colour, for example, might be a capability or a preference depending > on the circumstances of its use. > > This suggests to me that the distinction you draw should sometimes not be > bound to the feature tag. > > #g > > ------------ > Graham Klyne > ([email protected]) >