Re: one more question regarding emergency & priority
"Kevin Boyle" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.megaco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <34B3EAA5B3066A42914D28C5ECF5FEA413D08860@zrtphxm2.corp.nortel.com> |
Emergency and priority are independent elements, despite the tendency of many to build some equating relationship between the two. For instance, I may have a priority call that is not an emergency call. And not all jurisdictions may equate an emergency call with a priority call. While handling an emergency call is certainly urgent, the mechanisms for handling priority and emergency calls in the network are often different. There is some analysis done and recommendations made in H.248.44. Kevin -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Miri Epstein Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 8:16 AM To: megaco ietf Subject: [Megaco] one more question regarding emergency & priority Hi, According to the ABNF, it's possible to set both emergency and priority context attributes in an action request. For example: Transaction = 202 { Context = 5 { Emergency, Priority = 4, Modify = ip/10/if3/2 { ... What is the meaning of such a command? Is it only semantically permitted, but not practically used? Am I missing something? Many thanks, Miri _______________________________________________ Megaco mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco