Re: G.711 A-law assigned profile in H.248.1
Christian Groves <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.megaco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Albrecht and Greg, I'll make sure it finds its way into the IG. Regards, Christian Schwarz Albrecht wrote: > right, so that's an item for the Implementers' Guide > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Beis, Grigoris (NSN - GR/Athens) [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Mittwoch, 27. Februar 2008 09:09 >> To: Schwarz Albrecht; [email protected] >> Subject: RE: [Megaco] G.711 A-law assigned profile in H.248.1 >> >> No, I'm referring to the introductory section of Appendix I >> "Example Call flows" of H.248.1 V3 (09/2005). >> >> There it says that "...For example, G.711 A-law is called >> PCMA in SDP, and is assigned profile 0. G.723.1 is called >> G723 and is profile 4; H.263 is called H263 and is profile >> 34. See also http://www.iana.org/assignments/rtp-parameters." >> >> The most recent releases I could find on the internet that >> contain the above statement are H.248.1 V3 (09/2005) and its >> Amendment 1 to H.248.1 "Gateway control protocol: Version 3: >> Corrections and clarifications" (Geneva, 26 June - 6 July 2007) >> >> ________________________________ >> >> From: ext Schwarz Albrecht [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Tue 2/26/2008 5:41 PM >> To: Beis, Grigoris (NSN - GR/Athens); [email protected] >> Subject: RE: [Megaco] G.711 A-law assigned profile in H.248.1 >> >> >> >> Which particular signaling step(s) you are looking in >> Appnedix I? Step 12? >> >> [guess we got only "RTP profile for G.723.1 is 4"] >> >> >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Beis, Grigoris (NSN - >>> GR/Athens) >>> Sent: Dienstag, 26. Februar 2008 16:30 >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: [Megaco] G.711 A-law assigned profile in H.248.1 >>> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> I noticed that in Appendix I of both H.248.1 V2 and H.248.1 >>> V3 documents, G.711 A-law's assigned profile is 0 whereas it should >>> have been 8. >>> >>> Is this just a typeo? >>> >>> BR, >>> Greg >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Megaco mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco >>> >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Megaco mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco > > >