Re: one more question regarding emergency & priority
"Miri Epstein" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.megaco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thank you very much! -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Boyle [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 7:10 PM To: Miri Epstein; megaco ietf Subject: RE: [Megaco] one more question regarding emergency & priority That is actually a far more difficult question than it appears on the surface. "Emergency" calls are often regulatory in nature -- local governments often have rules as to how those calls are to be handled, in terms of minimum service guarantees, mandatory hold and other kinds of things. "Priority" calls, on the other hand, are often customer driven requirements -- military or government calls that may be given access to reserved bandwidth or pre-emption rights depending on how the priority handling is defined in the network. In most cases, access is very different. Emergency calls are generally accessible through dialing a particular address -- 911 in NA, or 999 in many European countries as an example. Priority calls, on the other hand, require dialing an access code followed by a PIN in most configurations. This restricts priority access to authorized individuals, and allows for communications that are generally unavailable to the general populace. Essentially, "emergency" enforces requirements while "priority" grants privilege. I suppose it is possible that an authorized individual could place a priority call to an emergency services bureau, in which case the call would be subject to the requirements of an emergency call and would be granted the privileges of a priority call. I don't see those two being a one or the other proposition. It seems to me that they would end up being complementary. So, the short answer to your question of whether it would be considered an emergency or priority call would be "yes". I believe that the call would be both, and the relevant procedures of both would come to bear. Please review H.248.44. There is discussion of a number of priority schemes and how they might relate to the Priority Attribute in H.248. It provides detail that may be of help. Kevin -----Original Message----- From: Miri Epstein [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 11:05 AM To: Boyle, Kevin (NCRTP:0Q10); megaco ietf Subject: RE: [Megaco] one more question regarding emergency & priority Hi Kevin, Thanks for your response. Assuming the mechanisms for handling priority and emergency calls in the network are often different. Is it possible that a call be assigned both as an emergency call and a priority call (as shown in the example of my previous email)? If the answer is yes, how the call is handled? Is it considered an emergency call or a priority call? Thanks, Miri -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Boyle [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 12:31 AM To: Miri Epstein; megaco ietf Subject: RE: [Megaco] one more question regarding emergency & priority Emergency and priority are independent elements, despite the tendency of many to build some equating relationship between the two. For instance, I may have a priority call that is not an emergency call. And not all jurisdictions may equate an emergency call with a priority call. While handling an emergency call is certainly urgent, the mechanisms for handling priority and emergency calls in the network are often different. There is some analysis done and recommendations made in H.248.44. Kevin -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Miri Epstein Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 8:16 AM To: megaco ietf Subject: [Megaco] one more question regarding emergency & priority Hi, According to the ABNF, it's possible to set both emergency and priority context attributes in an action request. For example: Transaction = 202 { Context = 5 { Emergency, Priority = 4, Modify = ip/10/if3/2 { ... What is the meaning of such a command? Is it only semantically permitted, but not practically used? Am I missing something? Many thanks, Miri _______________________________________________ Megaco mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco