Re: BICC directly over SCTP

Hello Sohail,

I suggest you check out the Q.2150.x sub-series of Recommendations. 
Especially Q.2150.3
http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-Q.2150.3/en

Regards, Christian

Kevin Boyle wrote:
> The portion of this question relevant to H.248 has to do with the BICC 
> over SCTP question.  Since BICC uses H.248, it is possible that 
> portion of the BICC stack could run over SCTP directly.  See H.248.4.
>  
> As to statements about what particular vendors are doing, it is really 
> unwise for non-employees to post details of other vendors products.  
> It leads to misunderstandings, promotes misinformation and can lead to 
> accusations of collusion.  If you have questions about particular 
> vendors products, please contact them privately about their products.  
> This list is for the general discussion of H.248, not for vendor 
> promotion or inquiry.
>  
> Kevin
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On 
> Behalf Of *Sohail Khan
> *Sent:* Sunday, March 09, 2008 10:21 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [Megaco] BICC directly over SCTP
>
> Hi All,
> May be this question is not relevant, but i appreciate if anyone knows 
> the answer.
>  
>
> In SIGTRAN protocol suite, ISUP runs on top of M3UA. My questions are:
>
> 1. Is this possible to run ISUP or BICC on top of SCTP
> directly.
>
> 2. If yes, what are the advantages and disadvantages
> for this approach. Also I heard that Huawei is using
> this approach. Any one working with Huwaei can put
> some light on it?
>
> Regards,
> -Sohail Khan
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Megaco mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco
>