H.248.48 vs Y.2173 (App. II) RTP/RTCP-based performance notification
"Schwarz Albrecht" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.megaco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <F4562D4585113D42AC08DC47FDEC49B0D5CB10@FRVELSMBS23.ad2.ad.alcatel.com> |
Hi Geoff, we did talk about the potential relevance of Y.mpm for RTCP HR/H.248.48 last year. Y.mpm is now under AAP as Y.2173: http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/aap/AAPRecDetails.aspx?AAPSeqNo=1738 Please have a look at Appendix II - Application scenario 2: RTP/RTCP-based performance notification (Is Fig. II.5 from you?) I didn't review Y.2173 so far, thus I may not comment whether this is consistent with H.248.48. At least I would suppose that reference point Mu would be related to H.248/H.248.48 in case of a reporting interface to ITU-T RACF (via Rw/Q.3303.2) or ETSI TISPAN RACS (via Ia/ES 283018). BR, Albrecht