Digit map syntax question

"Maxim Treskin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.megaco
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello

I have question about megaco digit map syntax.
Is digitmap, like "([0-9ef])" valid?
I use erlang OTP megaco stack, and it interpretes this digit map that
following numbers is valid:
"0ef", "1ef", "2ef" etc.
Is it right or there is error in megaco stack? I think that valid
number values must be:
"0", "1", "2", ..., "9", "e", "f"

Say me please, which method is right?

-- 
Maxim Treskin
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.