Re: What is the correct treatment when an action fails?

"Krishna Prasad Kalluri" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.megaco
Message-ID <EF4121B4EBC4E045BDE1273F9D0A87FF0649DDC1@esealmw107.eemea.ericsson.se>
Hi Nurit,
 
It depends on whether the first command is marked with optional flag or
not. If the first command is marked with "optional" flag then you have
to continue and execute the section action request.
 
Here is the description from H.248.v2 page 43
Commands may be marked as "Optional" which can override this behaviour -
if a command marked as Optional results in an error, subsequent commands
in the Transaction will be executed.
 
So though the "optional" indication is there at the command level it
applies to the Action request. The above statement is saying subsequent
commands in the "TRANSACTION".
 
Regards
Krishna 


________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Nurit Shenhar
Sent: den 16 september 2008 13:11
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Megaco] What is the correct treatment when an action fails?



Hi all

 

Assuming we have two actions in a transaction, the first refers to ALL
contexts and the second refers to the NULL context, what should be the
correct treatment if there are no active contexts on the gateway?
Should the second action be performed?

 

The standard refers to the case in which a command fails, but not to the
case in which the action fails.

 

Thanks,

 

Nurit Shenhar

Control and management Leader

 

 

  

Email: [email protected]

Tel.  +972-3-9764155

Fax. +972-3-9764223

www.audiocodes.com <http://www.audiocodes.com/> 

 

 

 


________________________________

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential material.
They are intended solely for the use of the designated individual or
entity to whom they are addressed. If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
use, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful.

If you have received this email in error please immediately notify the
sender and delete or destroy any copy of this message

_______________________________________________
Megaco mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco
image004.jpg (image/jpeg, 2 KB) - not displayed
image003.gif (image/gif, 2.4 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.