Re: Inconsistency in Digit Map timers definition

Christian Groves <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.megaco
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello Seraya,

As far as I know the start timer (T) is a valid part of the digit map 
syntax. The operation of the start timer is discussed elsewhere in 7.1.14

Regards, Christian

Seraya Miletzki wrote:
> WARNING: contains banned part
>   
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> Inconsistency in Digit Map timers definition
> From:
> Seraya Miletzki <[email protected]>
> Date:
> Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:07:02 +0300
> To:
> "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>
> To:
> "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>
>
> Hi
>
> At H.248/1 V3  at       7.1.14.3        DigitMap syntax - "In addition to these event symbols, the string may contain "S" and "L" inter-event timing specifiers and the "Z" duration modifier."
>
> At annex B Start timer (T) is also a valid symbol in the digitmap string.
>
>
> digitMapLetter          = DIGIT               ;Basic event symbols
>
>                           / %x41-4B / %x61-6B ; a-k, A-K
>
>                           / "L" / "S" / "T"   ;Inter-event timers
>
>                                                ; (long, short, start)
>
>                           / "Z"               ;Long duration modifier
>
>
> Need to specify the right pattern .
>
> I think that the start timer is not a valid string here -Please comment.
>
>
> Seraya
>
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Megaco mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.