Re: MGC and virtual MG

The MGC only needs one mid.

Ron Ho wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification. So one MGC can control multiple MGs. Does the
> MGC need multiple mid, one for each MG? Or the MGC needs one only mid and
> every MGs send to the same MGC using the same mid of the MGC?
> 
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Tom Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> You should be able to control multiple virtual MG from one MGC instance if
>> you need to. I can see a simple use case for this, where the normal MGC for
>> one of the virtual MGs has failed and an MGC controlling another virtual MG
>> takes its place. I am sure there are other applications.
>>
>> And yes, you can multiplex control associations for multiple virtual MGs
>> over the same physical connection. You would have to take some care not to
>> clear down the connection just because one virtual MG is doing a restart.
>>
...