Re: IP changeover Procedures

Akhil Jain <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.megaco
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,
Can someone please help ?
--Akhil Jain

--- On Sat, 21/11/09, Akhil Jain <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Akhil Jain <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [Megaco] IP changeover Procedures
To: [email protected], "Kevin Boyle" <[email protected]>
Date: Saturday, 21 November, 2009, 9:33 PM

Hi Kevin,
Thanks for the reply. So if MGC-active sends a Service change from IP2 (as IP1 has been down) then shall it will fill Handoff as reason and new IP address as IP2 in MGCIDtotry field ? If that is the case then shall MG will reply on the new IP i.e. IP2 ? Kindly help.
ThanksAkhil Jain

--- On Wed, 18/11/09, Kevin Boyle <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Kevin Boyle <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [Megaco] IP changeover Procedures
To: "'Akhil Jain'" <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, 18 November, 2009, 8:49 PM



 
 
 
Hi Akhil,
 
A change of address for the MGC implies a new control 
association.  That does not necessarily mean that any contexts will be 
altered; all it means is that the control association has undergone a 
change.  It is up to the MGC to clean up anything on the MG that is 
out-of-whack.  Given that this is really the same MGC (though the MG cannot 
possibly know that), the MGC can choose to take NO action and continue 
everything as it is.  I will note that the change of interface will take a 
non-zero amount of time, so there is the possibility that messages will be 
lost.  The spec is pretty clear that the MG has to send replies back to 
where the command came from, so there is no way that a change of IP address can 
not result in a change of association (see H.248.1, Clause 
9).
 
There is no way the MG could know that the MGC is the same one 
after the change of interfaces.  Please see H.248.1 Annex F for normative 
details on the ServiceChange procedures that are then used in the overall 
procedures in Supplement 7.
 
Kevin


  
  
  From: [email protected] 
  [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Akhil 
  Jain
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 5:30 AM
To: 
  [email protected]
Subject: [Megaco] IP changeover 
  Procedures


  
  
    
    
      Hi All,
        

        Per our Implementation, we need to provide Interface Redundancy at 
        MGC end, the architecture we were going to implement is MGC-Active will 
        have 2 IP interfaces and MGC-Standby will have 2 IP interfaces.Can 
        someone help in answering following things:
        

        1. If an Association has been established between MGC-Active (IP1) 
        and peer MG, and now IP1 of MGC-Active has gone down and IP-2 of 
        MGC-Active needs to takeover without breaking the current control 
        association how can we achieve that? 
        <<< Per "Updated Draft ITU-T H.Sup7 “Gateway Control 
        Protocol: Establishment Procedures for the H.248 MGC-MG Control 
        Association” (Ed. 0.14)" ServiceChangeAddress field can be used by MGC 
        to tell new IP address for remaining association. But the document has 
        suggested the use of Service Change Address field in the "Association 
        Establishment Phase".
        Another thing if MGC 
        sends ServiceChangeMethod as "Handoff" then It would mean that MGC wants 
        a new association but that is not the case, MGC only wants to change the 
        address for rest of the association. >>>
        

        2. If we use MGCIDtotry 
        field in the ServiceChange command then MGC will send this command 
        through IP2 (as IP1 of MGC has been down) so, how will MG got to know 
        that this request has been sent by MGC that has been registered on IP1. 
        Shall it recognizes the MGC via MID ?
        

        Kindly 
        help!
        

        Thanks
        Akhil 
        Jain

  
  Now, send attachments up to 25MB with Yahoo! India Mail. Learn how. 





       
The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage.


      The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage. http://in.yahoo.com/

_______________________________________________
Megaco mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.