Re: H.248 using RFC2833/RFC2198 and SRTP/MIKEY
"Schwarz Albrecht" <[email protected]> Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:02:02 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.megaco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <F4562D4585113D42AC08DC47FDEC49B002886B49@FRVELSMBS23.ad2.ad.alcatel.com> |
to 1): - RFC2833 is obsoleted by RFC 4733, ...! - just use the SDP elements as defined by the RFCs in the H.248 LD/RD - it looks fairly strange to use H.248 binary encoding when such SDP-controlled RTP capabilities are used in the IP domain; do you really want to translate SDP text encoding at your MGC call control interface in "SDP binary" format at H.248? to 2): - see Draft H.248.77 for H.248-controlled SRTP endpoints - see 3GPP 23.334 and 29.334 as a first H.248 Profile with SRTP support > negotiate SRTP contexted between the MG and peer media > endpoint ?(can be also H.248 MG but also any other kind of You refer to the IP media-path (RFC 5479) related keying methods for SRTP. Any procedures at the H.248 MG "IP media-path" interface are per se out of scope of H.248. If ... then subject of an H.248 profile specification. > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kukosa, Tomas > Sent: Donnerstag, 17. Juni 2010 10:59 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Megaco] H.248 using RFC2833/RFC2198 and SRTP/MIKEY > > Hello, > > I start looking to H.248 protocol and studying what it can do > and what can't. > > I am not able to find any documents related to following > topics/questions: > > 1) RFC2833/RFC2198 > - how the MGC can get RFC2833/RFC2198 capabilities from the > MG? (used payload types, list of supported tones, ...) > - how the MGC can put peer RFC2833/RFC2198 capabilities to > the MG termination? > > 2) SRTP/MIKEY > - is there any document how to use MIKEY within H.248 to > negotiate SRTP contexted between the MG and peer media > endpoint ?(can be also H.248 MG but also any other kind of > SRTP endpoint) > > BTW I would prefer to use binary encoding of H.248 and if I > understand it well it can not use SDP equivalent properties, > is it right? > > Thanks in advance for any hint. > > Best regards, > Tomas > _______________________________________________ > Megaco mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco >