H.323/H.245 interworking (H.248.12); RE: H.248 using RFC2833/RFC2198 and SRTP/MIKEY
"Schwarz Albrecht" <[email protected]> Sat, 19 Jun 2010 12:11:23 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.megaco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <F4562D4585113D42AC08DC47FDEC49B002886B94@FRVELSMBS23.ad2.ad.alcatel.com> |
Sounds like a topic for H.248.12, if H.245-to-H.248 interworking aspects, right? Perhaps you need an extension/upversion of the H.248.12 H245 Package. Do you terminate H.245 at MG or MGC level? Did you already consider H.248.12? > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kukosa, Tomas > Sent: Freitag, 18. Juni 2010 09:30 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Megaco] H.248 using RFC2833/RFC2198 and SRTP/MIKEY > > Hi, > > thanky you for your response. > > I would like to avoid SDP as it not my favorit protocol. > > But I have not find any possibility how to map H.245 TCS to H.248. > Especially receiveRTPAudioTelephonyEventCapability and > mediaPacketizationCapability. > > I.e. my question does not come from SDP but from H.245 area. > > Best regards, > Tomas > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Schwarz Albrecht [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 2:02 PM > To: Kukosa, Tomas; [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Megaco] H.248 using RFC2833/RFC2198 and SRTP/MIKEY > > to 1): > - RFC2833 is obsoleted by RFC 4733, ...! > - just use the SDP elements as defined by the RFCs in the H.248 LD/RD > - it looks fairly strange to use H.248 binary encoding when > such SDP-controlled RTP capabilities are used in the IP > domain; do you really want to translate SDP text encoding at > your MGC call control interface in "SDP binary" format at H.248? > > to 2): > - see Draft H.248.77 for H.248-controlled SRTP endpoints > - see 3GPP 23.334 and 29.334 as a first H.248 Profile with > SRTP support > > > negotiate SRTP contexted between the MG and peer media > endpoint ?(can > > be also H.248 MG but also any other kind of > > You refer to the IP media-path (RFC 5479) related keying > methods for SRTP. > Any procedures at the H.248 MG "IP media-path" interface are > per se out of scope of H.248. > If ... then subject of an H.248 profile specification. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kukosa, Tomas > > Sent: Donnerstag, 17. Juni 2010 10:59 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [Megaco] H.248 using RFC2833/RFC2198 and SRTP/MIKEY > > > > Hello, > > > > I start looking to H.248 protocol and studying what it can > do and what > > can't. > > > > I am not able to find any documents related to following > > topics/questions: > > > > 1) RFC2833/RFC2198 > > - how the MGC can get RFC2833/RFC2198 capabilities from the MG? > > (used payload types, list of supported tones, ...) > > - how the MGC can put peer RFC2833/RFC2198 capabilities > to the MG > > termination? > > > > 2) SRTP/MIKEY > > - is there any document how to use MIKEY within H.248 to negotiate > > SRTP contexted between the MG and peer media endpoint ?(can be also > > H.248 MG but also any other kind of SRTP endpoint) > > > > BTW I would prefer to use binary encoding of H.248 and if I > understand > > it well it can not use SDP equivalent properties, is it right? > > > > Thanks in advance for any hint. > > > > Best regards, > > Tomas > > _______________________________________________ > > Megaco mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco > > > _______________________________________________ > Megaco mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco >