Error in H.248.41 IP Realm Availability package definition?
Charlie Ross <[email protected]> Mon, 25 Apr 2011 16:28:12 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.megaco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <4C9A0A1285A73648BBB8707F62E26A2F50582EFFEF@EUSAACMS0714.eamcs.ericsson.se> |
Hello, In H.248.41 Amendment 1, the IP Realm Availability (ipra) package is defined as extending the IP Domain Connection (ipdc) package. IP Realm Availability has a property, "available realms" (ar), that is assigned binary property ID 0x0001. This appears to clash with the inherited "realm" property that is assigned property ID 0x0001 in the parent IP Domain Connection package. From other examples of package extension that I have seen, it seems that the available realms property should have been given a binary ID that is unique within the IP Realm Availability definition, such as 0x0002. This would allow both properties to be referenced through IP Realm Availability [package ID: 0x00e0]. ipra/realm [0x00e00001] ipra/ar [0x00e00001? or 0x00e00002] Is this possibly an oversight in the standard or is there some other way to distinguish these properties within IP Realm Availability when using binary encoding? Thanks for your insights, Charlie Ross Media Gateway Design Architect Ericsson BCAM Business Unit email: [email protected] _______________________________________________ Megaco mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco