Re: Media flow managed by 2 terminations
"Schwarz, Albrecht (Albrecht)" <[email protected]> Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:24:46 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.megaco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <5F7BCCF5541B7444830A2288ABBEBC96215F6E9827@FRMRSSXCHMBSD2.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> |
> Does H.248.1 allow this?
I think so.
Guess that following aspect might be also relevant:
Does the D-channel carry
a) just a single type of frames (e.g. exclusively X.25 traffic); or
b) a multiplex of s-, p- or/and f-type frames (e.g., a mix of Q.921 signalling, X.25 packet and frame relay traffic).
Possible alternatives to the considered ephemeral termination for the "X.25/D-channel/{16|64}TDM bearer":
1) static configuration, i.e., without any H.248 context, see ETSI TS 183002, ยง 7.3.2.2
-> using an X.25-over-SCTP bearer
-> 7.3.2.4.2 IUA/SCTP for X.25 or frame relay traffic
2) H.248 Mux termination
use case here: Figure 9 (ex 6)/H.248.1 - Multiplexed termination scenario - Single-to-multiple terminations
-> Circuit 1 = D-channel
-> StreamID = x: p-type (X.25) frames
3) SDP for TDM (old proposal: draft-taylor-mmusic-sdp-tdm-01.txt)
-> single physical termination
-> initially 'TDM'
-> after detection modified to 'PKT/TDM'
The attributes
a=netprof:<profile>
a=e2eprof:<profile>
could be used to "profile the D-channel" for the specific type frames
Just some thoughts,
Albrecht
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Javi
> Sent: Mittwoch, 13. Juli 2011 17:36
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Megaco] Media flow managed by 2 terminations
>
> Is it possible to manage a same flow by 2 termination (one
> physical and another ephymeral)?
>
>
> Specifically, I need to manage the packet flows (SAPI 16) in
> a D-channel
> ISDN. My proposal is to use:
>
> + A physical termination to manage the overall D-channel. When that
> termination detects a packet flow (SAPI 16/TEI x), it would send a
> notify to the MGC.
>
> + MGC would create an ephemeral termination to manage that
> packet flow
> (SAPI 16/TEI x) and the physical termination should continue
> to manage
> the rest of packet flows (with different TEI) in that D-channel.
>
> Does H.248.1 allow this?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Megaco mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco
>