Re: IP Address exhaustion in residential scenarios
"Bhattacharjee, Arindam (Arindam)" <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Oct 2011 09:06:13 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.megaco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <703C56B521385C4C9091299BE82357B7EE367324@USNAVSXCHMBSA2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com> |
Hi Tarun, Megaco is transport mode independent protocol, in general H248.67 defines packages for various transport modes supported by H.248. I think in your case you need upgrades from your MGC and MG vendors to have IPv6 support for megaco interface. -Arindam From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tarun2 Gupta Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 7:40 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Megaco] IP Address exhaustion in residential scenarios Hi All Does Megaco offer any solution to IPv4 address space exhaustion in CPE/residential implementations? In current architecture, a Softswitch (MGC) communicates with multiple CPEs (MG) over Megaco interface, each having its own public IP address. Since number of CPEs can be in the order of thousands, there is a risk of IP address exhaustion. How do I overcome this? Regards, Tarun Gupta Aricent =============================================================================== Please refer to http://www.aricent.com/legal/email_disclaimer.html for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication. =============================================================================== _______________________________________________ Megaco mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco