Re: IP Address exhaustion in residential scenarios

"Bhattacharjee, Arindam (Arindam)" <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Oct 2011 09:06:13 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.megaco
Message-ID <703C56B521385C4C9091299BE82357B7EE367324@USNAVSXCHMBSA2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com>
Hi Tarun,
Megaco is transport mode independent protocol, in general
H248.67 defines packages for various transport modes supported by H.248.

I think in your case you need upgrades from your MGC and MG vendors to have IPv6 support for megaco interface.

-Arindam

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tarun2 Gupta
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 7:40 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Megaco] IP Address exhaustion in residential scenarios

Hi All

Does Megaco offer any solution to IPv4 address space exhaustion in CPE/residential implementations?

In current architecture, a Softswitch (MGC) communicates with multiple CPEs (MG) over Megaco interface, each having its own public IP address. Since number of CPEs can be in the order of thousands, there is a risk of IP address exhaustion. How do I overcome this?

Regards,
Tarun Gupta
Aricent





===============================================================================
Please refer to http://www.aricent.com/legal/email_disclaimer.html
for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication.
===============================================================================

_______________________________________________
Megaco mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco