Re: Multiple Streams and mutiplex terminations
Javi Muñoz <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:57:16 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.megaco |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Christian, >>>> ISDNTerm/BA17/D [null context] >>>> >>>> ISDNTerm/BA17/D/SAPI16-TEI1 --- * --- HDLCPW1/BA17/D/SAPI16-TEI1 >>>> >>>> ISDNTerm/BA17/D/SAPI16-TEI6 --- * --- HDLCPW2/BA17/D/SAPI16-TEI6 > [CNG] I think there is only ever one physical termination. There can > be empheral terminations to describe the connection topology. > Something like the above would be possible I agree. > although you would need to work on your naming conventions to ensure > they are valid. I think this naming convention is valid: * Physical termination: ISDNTerm/BA17/D * Ephemeral terminations: ISDNTerm/BA17/D/SAPI16/TEI23 Do you think it has any problem? Regards, Javi