Re: Multiple Streams and mutiplex terminations

Javi Muñoz <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:57:16 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.megaco
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello Christian,
>>>> ISDNTerm/BA17/D [null context]
>>>>
>>>> ISDNTerm/BA17/D/SAPI16-TEI1 --- * --- HDLCPW1/BA17/D/SAPI16-TEI1
>>>>
>>>> ISDNTerm/BA17/D/SAPI16-TEI6 --- * --- HDLCPW2/BA17/D/SAPI16-TEI6
> [CNG] I think there is only ever one physical termination. There can 
> be empheral terminations to describe the connection topology. 
> Something like the above would be possible 

I agree.

> although you would need to work on your naming conventions to ensure 
> they are valid.

I think this naming convention is valid:

* Physical termination:     ISDNTerm/BA17/D

* Ephemeral terminations: ISDNTerm/BA17/D/SAPI16/TEI23


Do you think it has any problem?

Regards,

Javi