Fwd: minutes of MIDCOM session
Melinda Shore <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.midcom |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Here are the draft minutes from the midcom meeting earlier this week. Please send corrections to the mailing list. Many thanks to Juergen for taking notes. Begin forwarded message: > Minutes of the midcom session at IETF58 > > Minneapolis, Tuesday, November 11, 2003, 15:45 h - 16:00 h > > Melinda Shore reported on the WG documents status. The semantics > document was sent to the IESG. The protocol evaluation document > still in the RFC editor queue. The MIDOCM MIB document is delayed > but progressing. > > Mary Barnes reported on progress of the MIDCOM MIB design. The > MIDCOM MIB analysis document draft-ietf-midcom-mib-analysis-01.txt > was updating. It is awaiting approval to split FW functionality > from the IPSec Policy Configuration MIB. > > Two new issues were raised. It was questioned whether or not IP > address wildcarding is required for A0, and whether or not port > ranges larger than 2 port numbers are required. > > Out of the design teams, two drafts for the MIDCOM MIB were written > as individual submission. One approach uses explicit relationships > to used resources, the other one uses implicit relationships. > Currently, merging both approaches is progressing. Agreements were > made about > - realizing PRR policies on NATs by disabled bindings, > - realizing PER policies on NATs by NAT sessions (at least in > most cases), and > - the indexing scheme for groups. > Still under discussion is modeling of policy rules. > > It is planned to have a merged MIDCOM MIB proposal by Nov 27. > Then interim feedback from a MIB doctor will be requested. > Completion of the I-D is envisioned for February 2004 which > would allow submitting the document to the IESG around April > 2004. >