Re: MIDCOM Protocol Semantics <-> SNMPv3

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.midcom
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Melinda & Martin,

thanks for your quick and precise responses!

Kind regards,
Albrecht

----- Forwarded by Albrecht SCHWARZ/DE/ALCATEL on 24.11.2003 15:51 -----
                                                                                                                                                    
                      Melinda Shore                                                                                                                 
                      <[email protected]         To:      Martin Stiemerling <[email protected]>                                        
                      m>                       cc:      Albrecht SCHWARZ/DE/ALCATEL@ALCATEL, [email protected]                                        
                      Sent by:                 Subject: Re: [midcom] MIDCOM Protocol Semantics <-> SNMPv3                                           
                      midcom-admin@iet                                                                                                              
                      f.org                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                                    
                      24.11.2003 15:33                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                                    




On Monday, November 24, 2003, at 09:03 AM, Martin Stiemerling wrote:
> and
> | (2) if yes, will there be an additional "MIB plane" for provisioning
> | midcom boxes (besides the dynamic configuration actions according
> | "MIDCOM Protocol Semantics")?
> That's a question to the WG chair.

I think it's actually a question for somebody else.  Provisioning
is clearly out of scope for this working group.  There's not any
work going on that I'm aware of (modulo the NAT MIB, which is NAT-
specific).

Melinda




|---------+--------------------------------->
|         |           Martin Stiemerling    |
|         |           <Martin.Stiemerling@cc|
|         |           rle.nec.de>           |
|         |           Sent by:              |
|         |           [email protected] |
|         |                                 |
|         |                                 |
|         |           24.11.2003 15:03      |
|         |                                 |
|---------+--------------------------------->
  >------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                                                                            |
  |        To:      Albrecht SCHWARZ/DE/ALCATEL@ALCATEL                                                        |
  |        cc:      [email protected]                                                                            |
  |        Subject: Re: [midcom] MIDCOM Protocol Semantics <-> SNMPv3                                          |
  >------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|




Hi,

| Dear MIDCOM experts
|
| The "semantics draft" is now going for informational RFC in my
| understanding. SNMPv3 was recommended as MIDCOM protocol end of last
| year to my knowledge.

Yes, it is. SNMPv3 is the MIDCOM protocol.

| I'm wondering whether
| (1) SNMPv3 is used as "MIDCOM protocol syntax" for the "MIDCOM Protocol
| Semantics"?

The MIDCOM protocol will be implemented as a MIB module.

| and
| (2) if yes, will there be an additional "MIB plane" for provisioning
| midcom boxes (besides the dynamic configuration actions according
| "MIDCOM Protocol Semantics")?

That's a question to the WG chair.

 Martin

Martin Stiemerling

NEC Europe Ltd. -- Network Laboratories  [email protected]
PGP Key at:        http://www.stiemerling.org/stiemerling_nec.gpg
IPv4: http://www.ccrle.nec.de  IPv6: http://www.ipv6.ccrle.nec.de


_______________________________________________
midcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.