[Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-jennings-midcom-stun-results-00.txt]

At 06:17 PM 2/12/2004, Jiri Kuthan wrote:
>At 08:57 PM 2/10/2004, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
>>This is a great piece of work. Thanks to Cullen for putting this together.
>
>Cullen,
>
>thanks, that's indeed a very helpful piece of information. In particular
>the observation that modern NATs are rarely symmetric makes me feel better.
>(The current situation is AFAIK roughly up to 20% of user population is 
>behind symmetric NATs.)
>
>Can you send me STUN traces (PCAP at best) for some of the non-deterministic 
>NATs? Particularly according to some tests we did long time ago, Linksys WRT54G
>was symmetric all the time. Unfortunately, I no longer have one around to retest
>and I did not record firmware version either.

WRT to this particular case, linksys web tells me the box is Linux based
(http://www.linksys.com/support/gpl.asp) in which case chances are high
the box is symmetric all the times. I agree it would be good to verify your
list -- what a pity we just missed an opportunity at sipit.

-jiri