Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-jennings-midcom-stun-results-00.txt

At 04:19 PM 2/13/2004, Justin Uberti wrote:
>Here at AOL we have found that the WRT54G is port-restricted cone in its 
>normal mode, which is what is documented by Cullen. 

Interesting, I guess the WRT54G may have some patches -- I just retried
iptel's STUN against a Linux 2.4.21 box and the test result is symmetric.
(PCAP available for verification at http://iptel.org/stun_test)

>Our other test 
>results are also mostly consistent with the document, with the exception 
>of some Linksys models, where the difference may be explained by 
>different firmware versions. We were not able to find any symmetric NATs 
>in our admittedly small sample.

That's good news anyhow and thank you for this information.

-jiri