Re: Confirming hums

Jonathan Rosenberg <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.midcom
Organization dynamicsoft
Message-ID <[email protected]>
One point of clarification.

The update of STUN would comprise two changes. The first is your second 
point below. The second is to add a backwards-compatible mapped address 
attribute in responses that is obfuscated in some way, so as to prevent 
a NAT from modifying it.

-Jonathan R.

Melinda Shore wrote:

> A couple of hums were taken at the meeting in Seoul, and we need to get
> those documented and confirmed on the mailing list.  I wasn't there so
> I'm extracting from the minutes - I hope that someone will correct me if
> I'm misreading what happened:
> 
> 1) Updating STUN: Jonathan is going to update the STUN RFC.  It's going
>    to be done as an individual contribution with the expectation that
>    midcom participants would provide feedback.
> 
> 2) The diagnostics will be moved from the STUN revision into a
>    new document - that is to say, they're no longer part of the STUN
>    protocol.
> 
> 3) Fold the relevant portions of the MIB analysis document into the
>    midcom MIB itself, and not publish the MIB analysis (which isn't in
>    our charter, anyway)
> 
> Please post any corrections/objections/elucidations to the mailing list.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Melinda
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> midcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom
> 

-- 
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D.                600 Lanidex Plaza
Chief Technology Officer                    Parsippany, NJ 07054-2711
dynamicsoft
[email protected]                     FAX:   (973) 952-5050
http://www.jdrosen.net                      PHONE: (973) 952-5000
http://www.dynamicsoft.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.