Re: Port preservation
Cullen Jennings <[email protected]> Mon, 26 Apr 2004 19:36:49 -1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.midcom |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <BCB31551.3B07C%[email protected]> |
On 4/26/04 7:00 PM, "Christopher A. Martin" <[email protected]> wrote: > For clarity, common server ports in this example would be HTTP, SMTP, > FTP, etc. Well for TCP, the NATs don't muck with ports at all. The clients I have for HTTP, SMTP, FTP, also use source ports different than the destination ports so that the clients don't have to open a port under 1024 which would require them to be running as root.