Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-midcom-mib-01.txt
Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]> Fri, 14 May 2004 22:24:58 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.midcom |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 09:39:16PM -0500, Christopher A. Martin wrote: > Just a thought...SNMP has always been the sore spot when it comes to > managing devices behind a nat. Before snmp v3 I would never have asked > rfor such functionality, but now... See RFC 2962 for a discussion why the proper way to handle NATs is the usage of SNMPv3 proxies. Note: I am not saying it is easy - just that it is possible. ;-) /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen <http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/> P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany