Re: MIDCOM MIB suggestions for addressing the notification requirements
Martin Stiemerling <[email protected]> Fri, 06 Aug 2004 00:01:52 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.midcom |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <2C2734590DA1C88D64173AE7@753F3B888A9969457862729D> |
Hi Rohan, we are coming slightly back to this during the MIDCOM session. Thanks, Martin --On Mittwoch, 28. Juli 2004 16:34 Uhr -0700 Rohan Mahy <[email protected]> wrote: | Hi, | | When working on the requirements for MIDCOM, I observed that the | notification requirement always seemed slightly misplaced. Many of the | motivations for notification had to do with monitoring or traditional | network management of some kind which was orthogonal to the core open and | close pinholes and bindings functionality in the semantics document. | What really convinced me that the notification function was separate was | when I started to imagine all the other things that might want to be | decoupled from the core MIDCOM protocol and still find out about | MIDCOM-related notifications. | | To that end, I propose that we allow the MIDCOM notification to be | decoupled from the core MIDCOM MIB, and that we reuse an existing MIB to | facilitate the notifications. Specifically, we can use the Event MIB | (RFC 2981) to set notifications for interesting events that occur with | other MIB variables. | | For example, the simplest use of the Event MIB would monitor the | Application Management MIB (RFC 2564) to receive notifications if the | middlebox controller application terminates unexpectedly or is going down | for maintenance. | | In another example, the Event MIB would monitor the Meter MIB (RFC 2720-- | which provides a MIB for the real-time traffic of individual network | flows) to see if certain flows exceed a threshold (or when the traffic | flow drops to zero for a period of time). | | Finally, the Event MIB could monitor the the Host Resources MIB (RFC | 1514) to watch for CPU or memory consumption thresholds. | | All of this type of monitoring is much closer to the traditional uses of | SNMP than the rest of the MIB, and so is much more likely to be useful by | other more traditional SNMP monitoring applications. It would be a shame | to reinvent a MIDCOM-specific notification mechanism, when a more general | one is already in use that is likely to be more appropriate for many of | its consumers. | | thanks, | -rohan | | | _______________________________________________ | midcom mailing list | [email protected] | https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom |