Results on draft-jennings-midcom-stun-results-01.txt
Tony Yat-Tung Cheung <[email protected]> Fri, 3 Sep 2004 15:19:59 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.midcom |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all, It's useful to have some NAT type results on draft-jennings-midcom-stun-results-01.txt, to know what's out there on the market. I've read that the NAT type is discovered using the WinStun utility, is it the case? I have performed ethereal capture on the STUN requests from the WinStun utility and found that it is not strictly following the NAT discovery as outlined in the RFC 3489. Therefore, the results may not be the same, if someone performs the NAT discovery following RFC 3489. I also have a question on the NAT discovery in RFC 3489. For the NAT discovery procedure, should all STUN requests be sent from the same source port? Thank you very much. Best Regards, Tony Yat-Tung Cheung