RE: Action item from yesterday's meeting

I think I understand the concerns as presented by both sides of this issue.
However, the concerns raised by Suresh appear able to be addressed outside
the scope of the MIB, based on Juergen's response (i.e. I don't see Suresh's
requirements for making the change to be compelling).  That said, as
Christian mentioned, if both models could be supported without a huge amount
of effort in the current version of the MIB (and not impacting the current
functionality provided by the MIB), I would also be okay with that.  Is this
a simple change/extension or does it have a broader impact on the MIB? 

Mary

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Melinda Shore
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 12:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [midcom] Action item from yesterday's meeting


I'm intending to get this issue closed in the next week (or sooner,
if possible).  Juergen and Suresh have presented their concerns, and
if there are other people who have opinions or questions or even
just want to indicate how they're leaning, that would be a big help.

Thanks,

Melinda


_______________________________________________
midcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom

_______________________________________________
midcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom