call for consensus on proposed semantic change

Melinda Shore <[email protected]> Sun, 21 Nov 2004 10:22:30 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.midcom
Message-ID <[email protected]>
There's been some discussion about whether or not midcom's semantics
should be changed so that the PER and PRR inputs would contain hop-by-
hop descriptions rather than end-to-end descriptions.  If you support
this change please post "yes" to the mailing list; if you do not support
this change please post "no."

The change would be reflected in changes to the existing MIB draft but
not to the published semantics RFC.

Thanks,

Melinda