Re: call for consensus on proposed semantic change

On Thursday, November 25, 2004, at 09:48 AM, Mary Barnes wrote:
> At this point, the lawyers have been provided the draft(s) that could 
> potentially be impacted.  The semantics draft was believed (at this 
> time) to be related to the potential patent claim; the MIB was not, 
> but since this discussion also related to the semantics, I felt 
> obligated to make the statement and since they have not completed the 
> evaluation, I can't actually make a definitive statement on that.

Okay, thanks.  Any additional specifics would be a help to the
working group, particularly:

1) whether this claim might have an impact on the proposed change
2) what the expected licensing terms might be

Thanks,

Melinda