Re: I-D on SAFENeT

Hi Richard,

I have read the draft but still do not know what the difference to the usage
of the MIDCOM MIB or SIMCO is?

Thanks

  Martin

--On Mittwoch, 6. Juli 2005 15:46 Uhr -0400 "Townsend, Richard L, JR 
(Rick)" <[email protected]> wrote:

| Hi all,
| After several discussions with ADs and others, we have reached the view
| that MIDCOM should be the group to discuss the I-D on SAFENeT, an
| enterprise solution to the NAT/FW traversal problem.  Melinda has asked
| me to advise you that the I-D is published as
| <draft-stott-behave-safenet-00.txt>.
|
| To see how SAFENeT addresses the NAT/FW traversal problem differently,
| let me refer you to sections of the I-D rather than rewrite them here.
|
| Section 1.5 describes what SAFENeT is trying to accomplish.
| Section 2 describes existing views/solutions of the NAT/FW traversal.
| Section 3.1 gives an overview of SAFENeT.
|
| We believe SAFENeT could be fit within other developing
| architectures/protocols if that's what the group desires and it is
| reasonable simple, in part, because it carves out a niche in that it
| addresses enterprise networks and does not try to solve the general
| problem.
|
| Comments are welcome.
|
| 	Rick
|
| _______________________________________________
| midcom mailing list
| [email protected]
| https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom