Re: updated TURN draft
Marc Petit-Huguenin <[email protected]> Tue, 02 Aug 2005 05:52:49 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.midcom |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Jonathan, Let say that a SIP client sends an Offer with a TURN Derived Transport Address in the m/c line to a second endpoint. The second endpoint, according to RFC 3264, "MAY send media immediately.", but the RTP packets will be discarded because there is no permission for this source address. The Offerer will be able to add a permission only after receiving the Answer, so RTP packets will be lost. If it is an audio session that is established, this means losing partially or completely the first word said by the user of the called party. Jonathan Rosenberg wrote: > Folks, > > I did an update to the turn spec. I goofed on the I-D boilerplate, so > there is a good chance it won't make it into the repository, in which > case I'll submit right after ietf. Either way, you can pick up the > update draft here: > > http://www.jdrosen.net/papers/draft-rosenberg-midcom-turn-08.txt > > There are many changes from the previous version, addressing most of the > comments and concerns I have received privately and on the list. The > comment on the list I did not resolve yet is how the server can > differentiate TLS vs. regular TCP connections, the former used for > shared secret requests, the latter for allocate. > -- Marc Petit-Huguenin Home: [email protected] Professional: [email protected] Work: [email protected]