Re: SIMCO with IPSec
Martin Stiemerling <[email protected]> Thu, 04 Aug 2005 11:05:11 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.midcom |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Stephen, --On Dienstag, 2. August 2005 13:35 Uhr -0500 Stephen Lyda <[email protected]> wrote: | Greetings, | | I was wondering if someone could elaborate on the need for the use of | IPSec with the SIMCO protocol. | | If this protocol is designed to be light-weight and usable with lower | end middleboxes, then I do not understand why IPSec encapsulation would | be a firm requirement for all messages. | | For the most part, it seems to me that SIMCO messages are going to be | traveling on a local, firewalled, network...and not vulerable to many | malicious attacks from the outside world. | | It seems SIMCOs session establishment messages would be adequate enough | to authenticate the SIMCO agent with the middlebox. The middlebox would | also have the option to reject or select configurations set up by the | agent. SIMCO works fine in all scenarios and basically there two cases to distinguish: 1) running SIMCO in an "unsafe" environment, e.g., over the Internet or in local Ethernet-based network with shared links 2) running SIMCO in a closed/controlled environment. You are referring to case 2). In this case there is indeed no need to run SIMCO over IPsec. IPsec is recommended to be used in case 1. However, it is up to you to decided whether you run SIMCO over IPsec or not. Martin