Re: security recommendations in MIDCOM MIB draft
Wes Hardaker <[email protected]> Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:56:53 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.midcom |
|---|---|
| Organization | Sparta |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "MS" == Melinda Shore <[email protected]> writes: MS> On 7/13/07 9:58 AM, "Wes Hardaker" <[email protected]> wrote: >> MIBCOM devices MUST implement SNMPv3 to allow for operators to rely on >> it's features in order to protect their traffic. Operators should use >> make use of SNMPv3, other protocols providing cryptographic protection >> or physical separation to to ensure MIBCOM traffic is secured. MS> Yes, that's pretty much where I am, too (note that it's actually MS> "midcom," although "mibcom" is a pretty great portmanteau jobbie). Drat (I know that of course). You know I fixed that a few times before rearranging what I was saying again? You can tell what 3 letter acronym I type too often ;-) sigh... -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc.