FW: [dmm] #49 (ondemand-mobility): observation of on-demand mobility (was: full on-demand mobility support)

"Seil Jeon" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.mip6
Message-ID <001301d0a2ca$71dee170$559ca450$__14192.2169983902$1433864405$gmane$org@av.it.pt>
Hi Alper and DMM folks,

We have tried to refine the issue in the on-demand WG draft as forwarded. I hope the issue has been clearly defined through the elaborated texts.
I'd like to get opinions on it.

Regards,
Seil


-----Original Message-----
From: dmm issue tracker [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 4:34 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [dmm] #49 (ondemand-mobility): observation of on-demand mobility (was: full on-demand mobility support)

#49: observation of on-demand mobility

Changes (by [email protected]):

 * cc: [email protected] (added)


Comment:

 The on-demand draft proposed three source IP address types, enabling  applications to configure the required type in the IP stack, according to  IP mobility requirements. Particularly, the sustained IP address is  proposed to provide on-demand IP mobility, which aims at activating IP  mobility support operation upon an MN's movement.

 Delivering the defined flag, IPV6_REQ_SUSTAINED_IP, from an application to  the IP stack through the socket API does not ensure the observation of on-  demand mobility principle where IP mobility is provided upon an MN’s  movement, because an initiated application may be served with IP mobility  even though the MN has not moved from the current serving network where  the IP prefix/address was assigned for the application. As a result, IP  mobility is activated before needed.

 An example scenario raising the aforementioned issue is as follows;

 1. The MN is configured with one or more Nomadic IP addresses.
 2. Once an application requests “sustained IP address” to the IP stack, it  will obtain a sustained IP address through a protocol procedure between  the MN and network.
 3. Other application initiated over the same serving network will use the  same sustained IP address while the MN remains connected at the same  serving network.
 4. The MN moves to another access network, and the previous (mobile)  sessions are working. A new application requests a sustained IP address.
 The existing sustained IP address is assigned to the new application as a  sustained IP address is already available in the IP stack.
 5. As a consequence, the new session is served by a remote IP mobility  anchor with necessary management functions, though the MN has not moved  yet.

 Moreover, we can suppose an example over a different address assignment  strategy, where each network assigns sustained IP addresses, i.e.
 sustained IP address assignment by default, enables an MN to have multiple  sustained IP addresses. When a new application is initiated and needs a  sustained IP address, the IP stack may or not select the locally assigned  one in the context of the default source IP address selection mechanism  [RFC6724][RFC5014], as the application has no means to explicitly request  such a demand to the IP stack.

 For providing the full on-demand mobility when using sustained IP address,  a new address preference flag will be needed, letting the IP stack select  a sustained IP address assigned from the current serving network. If not  available, it should request a sustained IP address from the serving  network.

-- 
-------------------------+----------------------------------------------
-------------------------+---
 Reporter:               |       Owner:  draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-
  [email protected]      |  [email protected]
     Type:  defect       |      Status:  new
 Priority:  critical     |   Milestone:
Component:  ondemand-    |     Version:
  mobility               |  Resolution:
 Severity:  Submitted    |
  WG Document            |
 Keywords:  on-demand    |
  mobility               |
-------------------------+----------------------------------------------
-------------------------+---

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/dmm/trac/ticket/49#comment:1>
dmm <http://tools.ietf.org/dmm/>


_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.