Re: Comment on draft-moses-dmm-dhcp-ondemand-mobility

Hi,

After closer look at RFC3315, it does not seem that this is the case in which
a Decline message should be sent. So, I am OK with the existing text as it is.

Thanks - Fred
[email protected]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Templin, Fred L
> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 11:21 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [DMM] Comment on draft-moses-dmm-dhcp-ondemand-mobility
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Section 3.1 of this document says:
> 
>    "If a client receives an IA Address option from a server with the IPv6
>    Continuity Service option in the IAaddr-options field, without
>    initially requesting a specific service using this option, it must
>    discard the received IPv6 address."
> 
> But, this might leave the server with stale state. Perhaps it should say:
> 
>   "...it should send a Decline message to the server and must discard
>    the received IPv6 address."
> 
> Same comment applies to the similar block of text that appears in
> Section 3.2.
> 
> Thanks - Fred
> [email protected]
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm