Re: Review request for the Home Network Prefix Renumbering in PMIPv6

Dear all,

I have reviewed the draft carefully. The solution makes sense, but the
express should be polished further.
For example, some abbreviation are given their full name, while some are
not (DHCP, RA, etc.). Please check it.

Best regards,
N. Kaneko

2015-09-18 16:30 GMT+09:00 [email protected] <[email protected]>:

> Hi, all,
>
>
> I have read the draft carefully and found it useful. HNP renumbering is
> necessary in many scenarios. One problem in the draft is the citation of
> RFC documents, e.g. sometimes [RFCXXXX], sometimes RFCXXXX. Please unify
> them.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Bohao
>
> Hi all
> Kindly consider to review the draft "Home Network Prefix Renumbering in PMIPv6": https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yan-dmm-hnprenum/ Before the WG adoption call, authors are willing to get further comments and improve the draft.
> J.
> --
> Jong-Hyouk Lee, living somewhere between /dev/null and /dev/random
> Protocol Engineering Lab., Sangmyung University
> #email: [email protected]
> #webpage: https://sites.google.com/site/hurryon
>
> ------------------------------
> [email protected]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>
>

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm