Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-mccann-dmm-prefixcost-02.txt

I had intended to bring this up during the session, but we are/were
pressed for time...

On 10/26/15 9:22 PM, Peter McCann wrote:
> I don't understand why you think it needs to be so complicated.  It
> seems much simpler than the other prefix coloring approaches I have
> seen being suggested, and much easier to see how applications would
> use the information.
> 
> I agree it might be wise to consult 6man and also MIF.  Perhaps Brian
> can suggest how to open the discussion to those other groups.

I think initial coordination with 6man should be explored. This can be
done by raising the issue on the 6man mailing list and asking for input.
We may need to work with other folks (perhaps in OPS/MGMT or RTG)
depending on how the prefix cost gets defined and its rate of change.

Regards,
Brian

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWOA1vAAoJEBOZRqCi7goqy3UH/RFB413gnqPaxsh4gX/IZ3yN
FULPsle4xD6ln+VuUBPYVSjBCvnO/k+ZrLmZCXuH99YxImLf+1W2I3JmOvecbh05
o2hi5m/rQAmKeFPiIXyMCpwSH1eo18TlVM3kAx51frOTSTJ20Ykw6HsYICPY5ZJM
zIJ5pp00e6BxBWs/tJwMBPQb/Mdyz0zm1C4AnSEcL4nYSgwQuBPUBsmWypDIv0WG
W+Ylhu2c5PcjK7prWxfVc29v6hWpeq7DhGCX3ZFtbtOlarW3O8gen4sb9jvyWH2f
L1l79JpdqTBEuC+kqlyCGxnwHXZcZpD1vTMlm5tecp1wx7vD9E2HtYvYkJo7PbU=
=HgNo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----